That’s why I feel like I can remember 12 numbers. It’s easier to remember it if you break it into chunks. I have to dial numbers all day, so I just look at the number and type it in. That’s my max I think (maybe 12 if I can focus hard enough). ![]() Wait, it’s capped at 9? I thought it was at least 10. Practicing these tests means they will not work well in examining your true, *general* working memory abilities. They only serve as an indication of broader working memory abilities. Serial working memory tests are one of the simplest working memory tests we could provide, especially if they are digit span tests since letters can be more easily chunked. It may improve the speed of training because a series of items are still presented, but that's besides the point. In sum, improving in specific working memory tasks only improves working memory to a very slight degree since improving, say, serial working memory doesn't exactly improve updating as in the dual n back tests. You may not immediately see how to chunk in a new working memory test and the items you chunk may not be numbers, they may be abstractions, or it may be a test that inhibits chunking. You could argue that you learned the concept of chunking and can apply this to any working memory test now, but this is an illusion. serial working memory tests), so you're wasting your time. improving your working memory in one particular task will only result in near transfer effects (i.e. that will spoil a result on the WAIS and 2. You can definitely train yourself to increase your digit span, but 1. ![]() This post might suggest that you want to know what digit span you should reach to be considered a genius at least in the domain of working memory.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |